Evidence Hub

Canagliflozin in Asian patients with type 2 diabetes on metformin alone or metformin in combination with sulphonylurea

Linong Ji, Ping Han, Y. Liu, Gangyi Yang, Nguyen Khoa Dieu Van, Ujjwala Vijapurkar, R. Qiu, Gary E. Meininger

Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism, 2014

676 participants · 86 citations

Abstract

AIMS: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of canagliflozin, a sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor, in Asian patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) inadequately controlled by metformin or metformin in combination with sulphonylurea. METHODS: In this 18-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study, patients (N = 676) received canagliflozin 100 or 300 mg or placebo once daily. The primary efficacy endpoint was change in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) level from baseline at week 18. Additional endpoints included change in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and percent change in body weight. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded throughout the study. Efficacy and safety were assessed in the overall population and in two strata based on background therapy. RESULTS: At week 18, canagliflozin 100 and 300 mg provided significant reductions from baseline in HbA1c compared with placebo (-0.97, -1.06 and -0.47%, respectively; p < 0.001). Relative to placebo, canagliflozin 100 and 300 mg also significantly reduced FPG (-1.0 and -1.4 mmol/l) and body weight [-2.2% (-1.5 kg) and -2.3% (-1.6 kg)]. Both canagliflozin doses lowered systolic blood pressure (BP) compared with placebo. The overall incidence of AEs was 38.6, 43.2 and 42.0% with canagliflozin 100 and 300 mg and placebo, respectively. The incidence of genital mycotic infections and urinary tract infections was low and similar across groups. Efficacy and safety findings in the two strata were generally…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 676 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free