Evidence Hub

Trends, utilisation and appropriateness of proton pump inhibitor prescriptions among recent initiators: a decade-long analysis of patients with a 1-year washout period (2013-2021)

Liu Y, Zhang N, Ren W, Wang S, Xiang M

BMJ open, 2026

Abstract

Objective: To describe temporal trends in initiation, dose intensity, utilisation and potentially inappropriate prescribing of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) among recent initiators in an urban Chinese outpatient setting.

Design: Retrospective, annual identification of recent PPI initiators using a 1-year washout definition (repeated cross-sectional approach).

Setting: Outpatient prescriptions recorded in the hospital information system of Jinshan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai, China, 2013-2021.

Participants: Adults aged ≥18 years who initiated PPI and had no PPI prescription in the preceding year.

Outcome measures: Primary and secondary outcome measures annual initiation rates (overall and stratified by sex, age group, dose intensity and indication), utilisation metrics (defined daily dose/1000 inhabitants/day, defined daily cost, drug utilisation index) and components of potentially inappropriate prescribing (indication-related, prophylaxis-related and incomplete diagnosis).

Results: Among 114 241 recent initiators (mean age 48.47 years; 51.43% female), initiation rates increased from 1.79% (95% CI 1.76% to 1.83%) in 2013 to 2.79% (2.74% to 2.83%) in 2021 (p<0.001), with the steepest rise in adults aged 18-34 years. High-dose initiation peaked in 2019 and then declined, while standard-dose initiation increased after 2019. Across 2013-2021, potentially inappropriate indication-related prescribing decreased (30.94% in 2013 to 10.36% in 2021), whereas…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free