Evidence Hub

Real-world pharmacological treatment of patients with hyperemesis gravidarum in 9 cities of China from 2019 to 2024: a cross-sectional analysis

Pan J, Wang J, Wang X, Zeng T

Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026

9,097 participants

Abstract

Objective: Analyze the trends and utilization patterns of medicine for hyperemesis gravidarum (HG) in nine Chinese cities over the past 6 years to provide a reference for clinical practice.

Method: The prescription data of drugs for patients diagnosed with HG from 2019-2024 were obtained from the Hospital Prescription Analysis Cooperation Project database of the Hospital Pharmacy Professional Committee of Chinese Pharmaceutical Association. A cross-sectional analysis was then performed of demographic characteristics, medication types, defined daily doses (DDDs), defined daily costs (DDC), combination therapy and comorbidities for HG.

Results: A total of 9097 patients diagnosed with HG, involving 12,505 prescriptions, with a mean age of 29.97 ± 4.35 years. The number of patients in new first-tier cities (Chengdu, Hangzhou, Shenyang, Zhengzhou) exhibited a significant increase. The proportion of advanced maternal age and ≥16 weeks patients has significantly increased. Vitamin B6, metoclopramide, omeprazole, hydrated magnesium hydroxide, and aluminum ranked highest in terms of DDDs. 87% of patients required hospitalization, where combination therapy was commonly observed, predominantly antiemetics combined with antacids/acid reducers. Total prescription costs and per capita costs decreased by 42.71% and 55.63% respectively. The gradual decline in the DDC of PPIs and 5-HT3 antagonists may be associated with the implementation of national centralized drug procurement in China.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 9,097 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free