Evidence Hub

Amino Acid Infusion for Kidney Protection in Cardiac Surgery Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: A Secondary Analysis of the PROTECTION Trial

M. Redaelli, Fabrizio Monaco, N. Bradić, A. Scandroglio, L. Ti, A. Belletti, C. Viscido, Margherita Licheri et al.

Anesthesiology, 2024

812 participants · 23 citations

Abstract

Background: In the PROTECTION trial (Intravenous Amino Acid Therapy for Kidney Protection in Cardiac Surgery), intravenous amino acids decreased the occurrence of acute kidney injury in cardiac surgery patients with cardiopulmonary bypass. Recruitment of renal functional reserve may be responsible for such protection. However, patients with chronic kidney disease have diminished renal functional reserve, and amino acids may be less protective in such patients. Thus, a separate investigation of such patients is warranted. Methods: For this study chronic kidney disease was defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate of less than 60 ml · min−1 · 1.73 m−2, and patients with estimated glomerular filtration rates greater than or equal to 60 ml · min−1 · 1.73 m−2 served as controls. The primary outcome was the occurrence of acute kidney injury. Secondary outcomes included severity of acute kidney injury, need for and duration of renal replacement therapy, and all-cause mortality. Results: Among chronic kidney disease patients (n = 812), compared with placebo, amino acids significantly decreased the rate of acute kidney injury (43.1% vs 50.3%; relative risk, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.74 to 0.99; P = 0.041; number needed to treat = 14) with a median percentage increase in estimated glomerular filtration rate from baseline to postoperative day 3 of 12.7% versus 6.5% (P = 0.002). In estimated glomerular filtration rate–based chronic kidney disease subgroups (30 to 39, 40 to 49, and 50 to…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 812 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free