Evidence Hub

Proton Pump Inhibitors for Inducing and Maintaining Remission in Eosinophilic Esophagitis: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Lucendo AJ, Gutiérrez-Ramírez L, Tejera-Muñoz A, Molina-Infante J, Arias Á, EUREOS Guidelines Committee

Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association, 2025

7,304 participants · 17 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy results in clinical and histological remission in approximately 50% of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) patients. We aimed to systematically update this topic due to cumulative data from pediatric/adult populations in wider geographical settings.

METHODS: A search in MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus databases was performed. Primary outcomes were clinical response and histological remission (<15 eosinophils per high-power field). Subgroup analyses included age group, PPI drug and dosage, study design, data origin, and risk of bias. Data were pooled using random-effects models.

RESULTS: Seventy-three studies comprising 7304 patients were included. PPI therapy led to clinical response in 65% (95% confidence interval [CI], 57.2-72.4; I2 = 0%) and histological remission in 45.4% (95% CI, 41.6%-49.3%) of patients, without differences between children and adults (41.4% vs 48%; P = .17). Overall, 34.1% (95% CI, 27.9%-40.5%) achieved <5 eosinophils per high-power field. Pooled effectiveness was significantly superior (P < .001) in Western Pacific areas, principally Japan (67.9%), compared with American and European areas (40.6% and 44.2%, respectively). Histological remission was significantly higher with double PPI doses compared with standard (51.7% vs 28.3%; P < .005). Response was significantly higher in studies with lower risk of bias. Maintenance half-doses led to sustained histological remission in 68.2% (95% CI, 63.7%-72.6%; I2…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 7,304 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free