Evidence Hub

Eradication of Helicobacter pylori With Vonoprazan-Amoxicillin Dual Therapy as an Alternative for Bismuth-Based Quadruple Therapy: A Systematic Review and Noninferiority Meta-Analysis

Passos PRC, Filho VOC, Noronha MM, Maia MCB, Cançado GGL

Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2026

5,866 participants · 3 citations

Abstract

Introduction: Whether the efficacy of vonoprazan-amoxicillin dual therapy (VADT) for Helicobacter pylori eradication is clinically acceptable compared with guideline-recommended bismuth-based quadruple therapy (BQT) remains uncertain. Prior analyses have largely relied on superiority frameworks.

Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, and CENTRAL were searched through December 23, 2025, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing VADT with BQT for H. pylori eradication. Intention-to-treat and per-protocol eradication were summarized through Bayesian meta-analysis as absolute risk differences. Noninferiority margins were prespecified at -10%, -5%, and 0% (superiority). Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated as secondary outcomes. Evidence certainty was assessed using GRADE.

Results: Eighteen Asian RCTs (5866 participants) were included. In intention-to-treat analyses, VADT achieved an absolute eradication increase of +2.27% compared with BQT (95% credible interval [CrI] -1.34% to +5.71%). The posterior probability of noninferiority exceeded 99% for the -10% and -5% margins but declined to 90.41% at 0%. In per-protocol analyses, eradication showed an absolute decrease of 0.28% (95% CrI -3.30% to +4.17%), with noninferiority probabilities exceeding 99% for the -10% and -5% margins, but declining to 56.43% at 0%. VADT was associated with significantly lower rates of dysgeusia, dizziness/headache, nausea/vomiting, and overall mild AEs. Evidence certainty was moderate for intention-to-treat…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 5,866 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free