Evidence Hub

Efficacy of gut-brain neuromodulators in functional esophageal disorders: a systematic review

Wang Z, Zheng Z, Wei X, Li X, Xin C, Tian D, Zhang H, Liu X et al.

BMC gastroenterology, 2026

Abstract

Background: Patients with functional esophageal disorders exhibit symptoms such as chest pain, heartburn, dysphagia, globus sensation, or reflux hypersensitivity in the absence of structural abnormalities. This is characterized by dysregulated gut-brain interactions and visceral hypersensitivity.

Methods: A systematic search of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science and the Cochrane central register of controlled trials databases was performed to December 31, 2025. Relevant randomized controlled trials (RCT) reporting the effects of gut-brain neuromodulator (GBN) therapy on functional chest pain (FCP), functional heartburn (FH), reflux hypersensitivity (RH), functional dysphagia (FD), and globus were analyzed.

Key results: Among 2538 screened records, 29 RCTs were included. Neuromodulators provided symptom relief in 18-67% of patients with FCP, with 52-71% achieving ≥ 50% symptom reduction. Moreover, 46-80% of patients experienced a globus reduction of more than 50%. In contrast, the number of included studies for RH and FH was small, and the evidence was inconsistent. In healthy individuals, human experimental models indicated that central or local sensory-modulatory pathways can mitigate acid-induced hyperalgesia, thereby offering a promising therapeutic strategy for RH. Convincing evidence to support the use of GBN in the treatment of FD is lacking. However, its effects on normal human esophageal motility also provides strategies for drug selection, although these outcome…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free