Evidence Hub

Non-cirrhotic Idiopathic portal hypertension in systemic sclerosis patients: report of one case and a systematic review of previous case reports

da Silva FS, de Pinho Costa JV, Júnior CADS, Santos ÉED, Júnior AJC, Oliveira ACS, Santos FPST, Kakehasi AM et al.

Advances in rheumatology (London, England), 2025

15 participants

Abstract

Background: The overlap of non-cirrhotic idiopathic portal hypertension (NCIPH) and systemic sclerosis (SSc) is rare. This article reports one case of a patient with SSc developing NCIPH and presents a systematic review of previously reported cases.

Methods: CARE guidelines and the PRISMA statement were applied.

Results: We report the case of a 52 year-old woman, presenting, in 2015, diffuse cutaneous scleroderma (SSc), treated with oral prednisolone and monthly intravenous cyclophosphamide. Three months later, she developed a scleroderma renal crisis, requiring hemodialysis for 18 months. Since 2017 she has not been on immunosuppressive treatment for SSc, the cutaneous involvement improved, and she has a stable Kdigo 3 chronic kidney disease. In 2019, she developed ascites. During investigation, NCIPH leading to small and medium esophageal varices and collateral circulation was diagnosed. Currently, the patient is undergoing prophylactic endoscopic band ligation of the esophageal varices and presents a stable condition. In the systematic review, 18 papers reporting 20 cases of NCIPH associated with SSc were included. Seventeen (81%) patients were women, with [Mean (SD)]: 56.71 (12.97) years. Classification of SSc was (N = 15): 10 limited, 4 diffuse, and 1 sin scleroderma. Clinical presentation of NCIPH was esophageal and/or gastric varices [19 (90,5%)], ascites [10 (47,6%)], and upper gastrointestinal bleeding [9 (42,8%)]. NCIPH was treated with diuretics [n = 9 (42,8%)],…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 15 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free