Evidence Hub

Outcomes after treatment with proton pump inhibitors in patients with ineffective esophageal motility: a systematic review

F. Sakr, M. Soheilipour, Fatemeh Maghool, Elham Tabesh, S. Bor, Peyman Adibi

Gastroenterology and hepatology from bed to bench, 2025

305 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Aim: This systematic review evaluated the effectiveness of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in improving manometric parameters in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) diagnosed with Ineffective esophageal motility (IEM). Background: IEM represents the most common esophageal motility disorder among patients with GERD. To date, no treatment has conclusively demonstrated efficacy in restoring esophageal motor function in these individuals. Methods: This systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. We conducted comprehensive searches of electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, and Scopus, until January 2024 to identify relevant randomized and non-randomized controlled trials. Criteria for study inclusion were based on the population, intervention, comparison, and outcome framework. Results: A total of 9 studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising eight non-randomized controlled trials (non-RCTs) and one randomized controlled trial (RCT). Out of 305 recruited patients with a diagnosis of GERD, 185 patients matched the diagnosis of IEM with manometric studies before and after a PPI treatment. PPIs used in the studies included omeprazole, pantoprazole, lansoprazole, and rabeprazole. The duration of treatment ranged from four to twenty-four weeks. Except for one study, there was no statistically significant improvement in manometric parameters following PPI treatment. Conclusion: Evidence from included studies indicates that although…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 305 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free