Evidence Hub

Acid Suppression in Mild-Moderate Laryngomalacia Without GERD: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Shaffer AD, Balogun Z, Tobey ABJ, Maguire RC, Simons JP, Dohar JE, Mccoy JL, Rushchak MV et al.

The Laryngoscope, 2026

343 participants · 3 citations

Abstract

Objective: To determine the efficacy of acid suppression therapy (AST) for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux (GER) and airway symptoms in infants with mild to moderate laryngomalacia.

Methods: From 2020 to 2023, infants ≤ 6 months old with laryngomalacia at a tertiary children's hospital were randomized to famotidine and feeding modifications (AST) or feeding modifications alone (no-AST). Laryngomalacia Airway Symptom Score (LASS) and Infant Gastroesophageal Reflux Questionnaire (I-GERQ-R) were completed by guardians. Of 343 patients approached, 257 were excluded due to severe laryngomalacia on LASS, severe GER (I-GERQ-R ≥ 16), prior AST, no laryngomalacia on laryngoscopy, recommendation for supraglottoplasty, and/or other airway anomalies. Twenty-one declined participation. LASS and I-GERQ-R were again completed 1-6 months following enrollment.

Results: Sixty-five patients enrolled; 40/65 (62%) followed up at a mean of 3.1 months (SD 1.4 months). Of these 40, 10 (25%) had mild and 30 (75%) had moderate laryngomalacia. Median I-GERQ-R was 11 (range 5-15) at the initial appointment and 7.5 (range 0-26) at follow-up (p = 0.002). Laryngomalacia resolved in 13/40 (33%) at follow-up based on LASS (p < 0.001). Patients randomized to AST (n = 20) and no-AST (n = 20) had comparable improvement on LASS (p = 0.3) and I-GERQ-R (p = 0.8). Additionally, the severity of laryngomalacia at initial consult did not have a significant impact on LASS (p = 0.3) or I-GERQ-R (p = 0.8)…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 343 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free