Evidence Hub

Higher Radiation Dose to the Immune Cells Correlates with Worse Tumor Control and Overall Survival in Patients with Stage III NSCLC: A Secondary Analysis of RTOG0617

Jian-Yue Jin, Chen Hu, Ying Xiao, Hong Zhang, R. Paulus, S. Ellsworth, S. Schild, J. Bogart et al.

Cancers, 2021

617 participants · 126 citations

Abstract

Simple Summary Emerging evidence indicates that the immune system plays an important role in controlling tumors during radiotherapy, and radiation-induced immune toxicity such as lymphopenia is associated with poor survival. However, the immune system is not considered as a critical organ at risk in radiotherapy partially because the radiation dose to the immune system is difficult to compute. In this study, we developed a model to compute the radiation dose to the circulating blood, which contains the majority of active immune cells. We then validated this model by examining the correlations of the blood dose with treatment outcome for patients enrolled in the NRG/RTOG0617 phase III clinical trial. We demonstrated that the blood dose was significantly and independently associated with overall survival and local progression-free survival. This result suggests that radiation dose to circulating immune cells is critical for tumor control, and decreasing the dose to the immune system has the potential to improve survival. Abstract Background: We hypothesized that the Effective radiation Dose to the Immune Cells (EDIC) in circulating blood is a significant factor for the treatment outcome in patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: This is a secondary study of a phase III trial, NRG/RTOG 0617, in patients with stage III NSCLC treated with radiation-based treatment. The EDIC was computed as equivalent uniform dose to the entire blood based on…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 617 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free