Evidence Hub

Efficacy and safety of lansoprazole combined with flupentixol-melitracen for functional dyspepsia: A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial

Xin-Yuan Wang, Ke-Han Yin, Li Cheng, Xiaoyu Wang, Ying Qiao, Xing Tang, Bo Wang, Xiu-Juan Yan et al.

World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2026

92 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Psychosocial factors play a major role in the pathogenesis of functional dyspepsia (FD); however, there is a paucity of evidence from randomized controlled trials supporting the use of neuromodulators in FD.

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of lansoprazole (LPZ) combined with flupentixol-melitracen (FM) in FD.

METHODS

This was a single-center, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial enrolling patients aged 18-80 years who met the Rome IV diagnostic criteria for FD. Patients with a positive Helicobacter pylori test or abnormal upper gastrointestinal endoscopy/abdominal ultrasound were excluded. Participants completed the Leuven Postprandial Distress Scale, Short Form Nepean Dyspepsia Index (SF-NDI), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), Generalized Anxiety Disorders-7, and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive LPZ (30 mg once daily) combined with FM (flupentixol 0.5 mg + melitracen 10 mg) or matched placebo for 2 weeks, followed by a 4-week follow-up. The primary endpoint was clinical response rate in the intention-to-treat population, defined as a reduction of at least 0.7 in the postprandial discomfort syndrome (PDS) score at the end of treatment among patients with a baseline PDS score of ≥ 1.

RESULTS

Between March 5 and August 10, 2025, 183 patients were randomized to receive LPZ + FM (n = 92) or LPZ + placebo (n = 91). At week 2, the clinical response rate was higher in the LPZ + FM group than in the…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 92 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free