Evidence Hub

Fourteen-day vonoprazan-amoxicillin dual therapy versus 14-day bismuth-based quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori treatment: a randomized clinical trial

Jin-Yan Zhang, Jinhan Chen, Yu-Lin Huang, Ji Li, Dong Xu, Zhong Xu, Xiao-Yi Lei

Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology, 2025

250 participants · 10 citations

Abstract

Background: Potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs) have shown potential in Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication, but the efficacy of dual therapy with P-CABs and amoxicillin remains underexplored. Objectives: This study evaluated the efficacy, safety, and compliance of a 14-day vonoprazan-amoxicillin (VA) dual therapy compared to a bismuth-based quadruple therapy (BQT) in treatment-naive patients. Design: A randomized clinical trial. Methods: This single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial enrolled 250 H. pylori-positive patients from November 2022 to April 2024. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive 14-day VA dual therapy or BQT (lansoprazole, bismuth, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin). The primary outcomes were eradication rates in intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses. Secondary outcomes included adverse events and treatment compliance. Results: Eradication rates in the ITT analysis were 92.0% for the VA dual group and 88.0% for the BQT group (p = 0.292). In the PP analysis, eradication rates were 95.8% and 91.7%, respectively (p = 0.188). The VA dual group demonstrated statistically significant non-inferiority to the BQT group in both the ITT and PP analyses (both p < 0.001). The incidence of adverse events was significantly lower in the VA dual group compared to the BQT group (11.2% vs 20.8%, p = 0.038), with no severe adverse events reported. The compliance rates of both groups were 97.6%. Conclusion: The 14-day…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 250 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free