Evidence Hub

Effectiveness of a Collaborative Deprescribing Intervention of Proton Pump Inhibitors on Community-Dwelling Older Adults: The C-SENIoR Pragmatic Non-randomised Controlled Trial

Romano S, Rodrigues AT, Guerreiro JP, Simões JB, Guerreiro I, Monteiro L, Lunet N, Perelman J

Drugs & aging, 2025

166 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

Background: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are commonly used and often prescribed inappropriately, which increases the risk of adverse events. Deprescribing is a health professional-supervised intervention aimed at reducing or discontinuing medications that may cause harm or no longer provide benefits.

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of a collaborative intervention involving community pharmacists and general practitioners in deprescribing inappropriate PPIs (ATC/WHO A02BC) among community-dwelling older adults (aged ≥ 65 years).

Methods: This was a pragmatic, multicentre, non-randomised two-arm-controlled trial with 6-month follow-up in Portuguese primary care, involving community pharmacies and family health units (FHUs) to deprescribe long-term PPIs (> 8 weeks). The intervention comprised a pharmacy-based patient awareness and education approach, followed by a clinical assessment by general practitioners to assess inappropriate use and initiate the deprescribing process, along with pharmacy-based follow-up to monitor the withdrawal process. The comparator was usual care. The primary outcome was successful deprescribing, defined as the discontinuation or dose reduction of any PPI at 3 and 6 months. Secondary measurements included clinical and drug-specific outcomes. An intention-to-treat analysis was performed.

Results: The study included 166 patients (mean age 74.2 years (SD 6.0 years), 59.0% female) who had been using PPIs for an average of 10.6 years (SD 7.3…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 166 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free