Evidence Hub

Acute kidney injury after pediatric cardiac surgery: A secondary analysis of the Safe Pediatric Euglycemia after Cardiac Surgery trial

J. Blinder, L. Asaro, D. Wypij, D. Selewski, Michael S. D. Agus, M. Gaies, M. Ferguson

Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, 2017

799 participants · 75 citations

Abstract

Objectives: To understand the effect of tight glycemic control on cardiac surgery–associated acute kidney injury. Design: Secondary analysis of data from the Safe Pediatric Euglycemia after Cardiac Surgery trial of tight glycemic control versus standard care. Setting: Pediatric cardiac ICUs at University of Michigan, C.S. Mott Children’s Hospital, and Boston Children’s Hospital. Patients: Children 0–36 months old undergoing congenital cardiac surgery. Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: Cardiac surgery–associated acute kidney injury was assigned using the Acute Kidney Injury Network criteria with the modification that a greater than 0.1 mg/dL increase in serum creatinine was required to assign cardiac surgery–associated acute kidney injury. We explored associations between cardiac surgery–associated acute kidney injury and tight glycemic control and clinical outcomes. Of 799 patients studied, cardiac surgery–associated acute kidney injury occurred in 289 patients (36%), most of whom had stage II or III disease (72%). Cardiac surgery–associated acute kidney injury rates were similar between treatment groups (36% vs 36%; p = 0.99). Multivariable modeling showed that patients with cardiac surgery–associated acute kidney injury were younger (p = 0.002), underwent more complex surgery (p = 0.005), and had longer cardiopulmonary bypass times (p = 0.002). Cardiac surgery–associated acute kidney injury was associated with longer mechanical ventilation and ICU and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 799 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free