Evidence Hub

Frequency of gastroesophageal reflux disease in nonatopic children with asthma-like airway disease

Yüksel H, Yilmaz O, Kirmaz C, Aydoğdu S, Kasirga E

Respiratory medicine, 2006

25 participants

Abstract

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is commonly associated with asthma; however, frequency in nonatopic children with asthmatic symptoms is unknown. The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of gastroesophageal reflux (GER) in nonatopic children with asthma-like airway disease that recur despite conventional asthma treatment and to evaluate the clinical response to lansoprazole treatment. Twenty-five nonatopic children aged between 1 and 16 years who have asthma-like airway disease and 25 healthy children were included in the study. All cases underwent 24 h pH monitoring with dual sensor catheters. Additionally, acid suppressor treatment was administered to patients diagnosed as having GERD and clinical response was evaluated. Major symptoms encountered in the patient group included wheezing and cough (88%, and 32%, respectively). Reflux episodes were more common in distal esophagus during the prone position (reflux index (RI) of 11.5+/-10.3 vs. 16.2+/-9.4 during supine vs. prone). All distal esophageal parameters were significantly higher in the patient group except number of reflux episodes lasting longer than 5 min (RI of 13.3+/-13.1 vs. 3.9+/-2.9 in the patient vs. control groups, respectively). There was a significant improvement in symptoms and requirement for medication with treatment (number of systems decreased from 2.3+/-0.6 to 0.4+/-0.6, P=0.00). In conclusion, GERD is significantly more common in nonatopic children with asthma-like airway disease…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 25 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free