Evidence Hub

Outcomes of Premature Ventricular Contraction-Cardiomyopathy in the Veteran Population: A Secondary Analysis of the CHF-STAT Study

J. Huizar, S. Fisher, Fredrick V. Ramsey, K. Kaszala, Alex Y. Tan, H. Moore, J. Koneru, J. Kron et al.

JACC Clinical Electrophysiology, 2020

39 citations

Abstract

Background: Premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) are associated with heart failure and PVC-Cardiomyopathy. The prevalence of PVC-Cardiomyopathy and outcome benefits of PVC suppression are not clear. We sought to assess the rate and outcomes of PVC-Cardiomyopathy from the CHF-STAT trial, a population with cardiomyopathy (LV ejection fraction 10 PVCs per hour). Methods: A secondary analysis of the CHF-STAT study was performed to compare the rate of successful PVC suppression (≥80% PVC reduction), “LV-recovery” (defined as improvement in LVEF ≥10% points) and PVC-Cardiomyopathy between amiodarone and placebo groups at 6 months. PVC-Cardiomyopathy was defined if both, ≥80% PVC reduction and LVEF improvement ≥10% were present at 6 months. Cardiac events (death or resuscitated cardiac arrest) were compared between PVC-Cardiomyopathy vs. non-PVC-Cardiomyopathy during a 5- year follow-up. Results: The rate of successful PVC suppression and LV-recovery were significantly higher in the amiodarone (72 and 39%, respectively) when compared to the placebo group (12 and 16%, respectively; P<0.001), regardless of cardiomyopathy etiology. PVC-Cardiomyopathy was present in 29% and 1.8% of amiodarone and placebo groups, respectively (P<0.001). Similar PVC-Cardiomyopathy rates were found in ischemic (24% amiodarone vs. 2% placebo, P<0.001) and non-ischemic populations (41% amiodarone vs 1.5% placebo, P<0.001). Death and resuscitated cardiac arrest were significantly lower in patients with…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free