Evidence Hub

Persistent cough following pulmonary resection: observational and empiric study of possible causes

Sawabata N, Maeda H, Takeda S, Inoue M, Koma M, Tokunaga T, Matsuda H

The Annals of thoracic surgery, 2005

240 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Following thoracic surgery, patients often suffer from persistent coughing. There is speculation regarding the cause. However, since few studies of that following pulmonary resection have been reported, we conducted an observational and empiric study of this issue.

METHODS: A cross-sectional assessment of 240 patients who had undergone a pulmonary resection was performed using a questionnaire regarding postsurgical persistent coughing. Further, therapy based on empiric results was given to 20 patients who had undergone a lobectomy and mediastinal lymph node resection for nonsmall cell lung cancer.

RESULTS: Seventy patients were surveyed within 1 year following surgery (subchronic phase), of whom 35 (50%) suffered from coughing, as compared to 30 (18%) of 170 whose postoperative time was 1 year or more (p < 0.0001). Presence of lung cancer, mediastinal lymph node resection, and gastroesophageal reflux (GER) symptoms were significant factors in the group of subchronic patients. Of the 20 patients who received empiric therapy, 90% saw their coughing symptoms improve after the course of medication.

CONCLUSIONS: In the present patients, mediastinal lymph node resection may have contributed to coughing after the procedure, which tended to improve after 1 year following the operation. Further, a secondary change, such as GER, caused by surgical intervention may also be a contributing factor in the subchronic phase.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 240 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free