Evidence Hub

Bleeding Disorder, A Newly Recognized Adverse Event Following Sacubitril/Valsartan Therapy

Al-Omari YW, Mustafa SA, Saleh AH, Abdel-Razaq WS

European journal of case reports in internal medicine, 2026

1 citation

Abstract

Introduction: Sacubitril/valsartan (Entresto) is the only currently approved angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) drug. It demonstrates important therapeutic outcomes in heart failure patients by reducing hospitalizations and deaths. ARNI is generally safe but concerns about adverse drug reactions (ADRs) exist. This report documents a potential bleeding disorder, evidenced by elevated prothrombin time (PT) and international normalized ratio (INR), as a newly identified ADR.

Case description: Despite not receiving anticoagulant medication, three male heart failure patients had elevated PT/INR values within 14 days to four months of initiating Entresto 50 mg twice daily. Temporary discontinuation (dechallenging) of Entresto resulted in a decline in PT/INR, while it increased upon re-challenge in at least one patient. Laboratory findings showed varying degrees of anaemia, occasional renal and hepatic abnormalities, with normal platelet counts. Naranjo scores (6-8) support a probable causal relationship between Entresto and the bleeding tendency, warranting careful coagulation monitoring during treatment.

Conclusion: This case series explicitly identified a probable causal relationship between Entresto (ARNI) and a potential bleeding risk as evaluated by the Naranjo ADR probability scale. By highlighting this previously unidentified ADR, this report attempts to raise awareness among healthcare practitioners regarding the need for vigilant monitoring of coagulation…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free