Evidence Hub

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease increases the risk of incident cardiovascular disease: a nationwide cohort study

Joon Ho Moon, S. Jeong, Hee-Suk Jang, B. Koo, Won Kim

EClinicalMedicine, 2023

351,068 participants · 138 citations

Abstract

Summary Background The various subcategories under the overarching term of steatotic liver disease (SLD) have been recently proposed by the nomenclature consensus group and endorsed by international academic liver societies. Our aim was to investigate the association between each subtype of SLD and incident cardiovascular disease (CVD) in a nationwide Korean cohort. Methods From a nationwide health screening database from Korea, 351,068 individuals aged 47–86 years between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2010 were included and followed until December 31, 2019 for a median of 9.0 years. Individuals were categorised into no SLD, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), MASLD with increased alcohol intake (MetALD), and alcohol-related liver disease (ALD). Hepatic steatosis was defined as fatty liver index ≥60. The primary outcome was a composite CVD, which includes non-fatal and fatal myocardial infarction and stroke. The subdistribution hazard ratio (SHR) was calculated using the Fine–Gray model with treating non-CVD-related death as a competing risk. Findings There were 199,817 male (56.9%) and 151,251 female (43.1%) with a median age of 55 years (interquartile range, 50–61). The prevalence of no SLD, MASLD, MetALD, and ALD was 44.3%, 47.2%, 6.4%, and 2.1%, respectively; and the incidence rate of CVD in each subcategory was 6.2, 8.5, 8.5, and 9.6 per 1000 person-years, respectively. MASLD (SHR, 1.19; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15–1.24), MetALD…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 351,068 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free