Evidence Hub

Successful Eradication Therapy for Helicobacter pylori-positive Atrophic Gastritis at the Sixth Attempt: A Case Report

Deguchi R, Shiraishi K, Arase Y, Dekiden M, Shimada H, Miyakita H, Ogimi T, Myojin K et al.

The Tokai journal of experimental and clinical medicine, 2016

1 citation

Abstract

A 74-year-old woman undergoing outpatient follow-up for reflux esophagitis and atrophic gastritis tested positive for Helicobacter pylori and underwent primary eradication therapy with lansoprazole (LPZ) 30 mg, amoxicillin (AMPC) 750 mg, and clarithromycin (CAM) 200 mg twice daily for 1 week in August 2012. A urea breath test (UBT) after this treatment revealed that eradication had failed. Secondary eradication therapy was carried out with esomeprazole (EPZ) 20 mg, AMPC 750 mg, and metronidazole (MNZ) 250 mg twice daily for 1 week, but this also failed. The third attempt at eradication consisted of EPZ 20 mg, AMPC 750 mg, and sitafloxacin (STFX) 100 mg twice daily for 1 week, but this also ended in failure. A fourth attempt using rabeprazole (RPZ) 20 mg (4 times daily) with MNZ 250 mg and STFX 100 mg twice daily for 2 weeks also failed, as did a fifth attempt in April 2015 using vonoprazan (VPZ) 20 mg, AMPC 750 mg, and MNZ 250 mg twice daily for 1 week. Eradication was finally successful after the sixth attempt, in which the patient was treated with vonoprazan 20 mg, MNZ 250 mg, and STFX 100 mg twice daily for 2 weeks.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free