Evidence Hub

Prevalence of sarcopenic obesity and sarcopenic overweight in the general population: The lifelines cohort study

C. Wagenaar, L. Dekker, G. Navis

Clinical Nutrition, 2021

119,494 participants · 83 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Sarcopenic obesity (SO) is defined by a relatively low muscle mass in combination with obesity. Sarcopenic obesity was first noted as a health risk in geriatric populations but has recently been recognized as a scientific and clinical priority that may extend beyond geriatric settings. Obesity is generally preceded by overweight, so the prevalence and health risks of sarcopenia in those with overweight (SOW) is of interest for preventive purposes. The aim of this study, therefore, was to assess the prevalence and determinants of SO and SOW in a general population.

METHODS

Participants (n = 119,494), aged 18-90 years were included from the Dutch Lifelines cohort study. Muscle mass was assessed by 24-h urine creatinine excretion and stratified for gender for analysis, and obesity was defined as a Body Mass Index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m2 and overweight ≥25 kg/m2. Multivariate logistic regression models were applied to assess the relevant determinants of SO and SOW.

RESULTS

Respectively for men and women the prevalence of SO was 0.9% and 1.4%, and prevalence of SOW 6.5% and 6.0%. In subjects with sarcopenia, BMI was ≥25 kg/m2 in 45.5% and ≥30 kg/m2 in 6.1%. Overall females had a higher prevalence of SOW and SO in all age groups except for SOW in males between ages 40-59. Also, age was a significant determinant of SO and SOW, with a rise in prevalence as of age 50. Of all subjects with SO and SOW, respectively 82.5% and 80.4% were below the age of 70. Compared to those…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 119,494 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free