Evidence Hub

Rare Presentation of Sequential Mucosa-Associated Lymphoid Tissue Lymphoma, Follicular Lymphoma, and Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: A Case-Based Review

Desai KJ, Patel AH, O'Dowd PT, Tworek JA, Misra PG, Ding L

Journal of community hospital internal medicine perspectives, 2026

Abstract

Introduction: Occurrence of 2 (or more) Hodgkin's and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma concordantly or sequentially in a single patient is very rare.

Case: An 88-year-old Italian male with a history of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma in remission and indolent follicular lymphoma under surveillance, presented with acute autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA). While initially speculated to be secondary to follicular lymphoma relapse, stable mesenteric lymphadenopathy compared to prior CT abdomen/pelvis and smudge cells on peripheral smear prompted further evaluation. Peripheral blood flow cytometry indicated a mature B-cell neoplasm, which was confirmed to be chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) with a bone marrow biopsy. Minimal improvement was observed with high-dose steroids, IV immunoglobulin, and rituximab therapy, ultimately leading to hospice care.

Discussion: A population-based cancer registry study calculated the prevalence of sequential or composite lymphomas to be only 0.44%. Their occurrence can be explained by the common precursor cells hypothesis, chronic antigenic stimulation, and microenvironmental dependence. Possibly shared fundamental genetic alterations and acquired distinct secondary events lead to divergent clonal evolution. Limited data are available on the incidence of sequential lymphomas, and our case emphasizes the need for large, multicentric studies to stratify their risk factors, clinical implications, and suspicion index.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free