Evidence Hub

Laparoscopic fundoplication versus lansoprazole for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. A pH-metric comparison

Frazzoni M, Grisendi A, Lanzani A, Melotti G, De Micheli E

Digestive and liver disease : official journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver, 2002

130 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Treatment strategies that abolish abnormal reflux could prevent long-term complications of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

AIMS: To compare the efficacy of laparoscopic fundoplication and lansoprazole in abolishing abnormal reflux in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

PATIENTS: Study population comprised 130 patients referred for possible antireflux surgery and with heartburn as the dominant symptom.

METHODS: After oesophageal manometric and pH-metric evaluation and detailed information 55 patients asked to undergo laparoscopic antireflux surgery while 75 chose a medical treatment regimen based on lansoprazole. Treatment efficacy was assessed by ambulatory oesophageal pH-monitoring.

RESULTS: All 55 patients who underwent fundoplication became free of heartburn: oesophageal pH-monitoring gave normal results in 85%. In patients treated with lansoprazole, at individualized daily dosages titrated to abolish both heartburn and abnormal acid reflux, normal pH-metric results were obtained in 96% of cases (p<0.05 vs surgically treated patients).

CONCLUSIONS: Lansoprazole at individualized dosages was significantly more effective than laparoscopic fundoplication, in the short-term, in abolishing abnormal reflux in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease patients.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free