Evidence Hub

Effects of rebamipide in combination with lansoprazole and amoxicillin on Helicobacter pylori-infected gastric ulcer patients

Masako Kato, Masahiro Asaka, Toshiro Sugiyama, M. Kudo, K. Nishikawa, M. Sukegawa, K. Hokari, M. Katagiri et al.

Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 1998

14 citations

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the additive effect of rebamipide with that of teprenone in combination with dual therapy on H. pylori eradication. A total of 102 H. pylori-positive gastric ulcer patients were assigned at random to two groups; in addition to dual therapy (amoxicillin 500 mg thrice daily and lansoprazole 30 mg every morning for two weeks), one group received rebamipide 100 mg thrice daily for eight weeks, while the other group received teprenone 50 mg thrice daily for eight weeks. H. pylori diagnosis after treatment was made by [13C]UBT. The ulcer healing rate was 85.7% in the rebamipide group and 79.5% in the teprenone group (P = NS). The eradication rate was 68.4% (95% CI = 54-83%) in the rebamipide group and 47.7% (95% CI = 32-61%) in the teprenone group (P = 0.043) by per-protocol analysis. These findings suggest that the efficacy of dual therapy may be increased by the administration of rebamipide.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free