Evidence Hub

Influence of anti-ulcer drugs used in Japan on the result of (13)C-urea breath test for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection

Murakami K, Sato R, Okimoto T, Watanabe K, Nasu M, Fujioka T, Kodama M, Kagawa J

Journal of gastroenterology, 2003

64 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The (13)C-urea breath test (UBT) is a simple breath test for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection, but several factors have been reported to affect the results of this test. In this study, the effects of the antiulcer drugs used in Japan on the results of UBT were determined.

METHODS: The subjects of the study were 64 adult volunteers who tested positive for H. pylori infection by the serum antibody method. Eight classes of anti-ulcer drugs used in Japan were administered at their usual doses to these subjects: lansoprazole, a proton pump inhibitor (PPI); nizatidine, an H(2)-receptor antagonist (H(2)RA); and polaprezinc, ecabet sodium, rebamipide, teprenone, cetraxate hydrochloride, and sucralfate, all mucoprotective agents. The study drugs were randomized for administration to the subjects, and each of the drugs was administered for 14 consecutive days. The UBT was performed on days 0, 14, and 21.

RESULTS: The mean Delta(13)C per thousand in the lansoprazole group was significantly decreased on day 14, to below 10 per thousand, in 4 of 16 subjects, and in 1 of the 4 subjects, the test result was negative, with the Delta(13)C per thousand falling to 1.7 per thousand. The value returned to baseline 1 week after the discontinuation of lansoprazole. The other drugs administered had no significant effect on the result of the UBT, except that the mean Delta(13)C per thousand showed a tendency to decrease after the administration of ecabet sodium and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 64 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free