Evidence Hub

Comparison of the efficacy of 400mg and 800mg of clarithromycin used with lansoprazole and amoxicillin in eradication regimens for Helicobacter pylori infection in a Japanese population

Miwi H, Murai T, Sato K, Ohkura R, Yamada T, Nagahara A, Ohtaka K, Minowa T et al.

Journal of gastroenterology, 2000

Abstract

We conducted a randomized prospective comparative study to determine whether a 1-week lansoprazole-amoxicillin-clarithromycin (LAC) regimen with 800 mg of clarithromycin a day was more effective such a regimen with 400 mg daily in the Japanese population. One hundred and seventy-five Helicobacter pylori-positive patients were randomly assigned to receive one of two different 7-day regimens, one with clarithromycin 400 mg (LAC 400 regimen) and the other with clarithromycin 800 mg (LAC 800 regimen). The cure rates for both regimens were similar, although adverse effects were significantly more frequent in the LAC 800 regimen, suggesting that 400 mg of clarithromycin may be sufficient in our patient population.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free