Evidence Hub

Health-related quality of life of patients with acute erosive reflux esophagitis

Mathias SD, Castell DO, Elkin EP, Matosian ML

Digestive diseases and sciences, 1996

Abstract

One thousand one hundred forty-five patients with acute erosive reflux esophagitis participating in an eight-week double-blind, multicenter study of lansoprazole 15 mg daily, lansoprazole 30 mg daily, omeprazole 20 mg daily, and placebo responded to a health-related quality of life (HRQoL) questionnaire at baseline and at two, four, and eight weeks. At baseline, there were no HRQoL differences among the four study groups. However, all three active treatment groups improved statistically significantly more than placebo on most HRQoL scales at each follow-up. There were no statistically significant differences among the three active treatment groups at week 2, although in most instances lansoprazole 30 mg showed slightly more improvement. After week 2, benefits in all the study groups leveled off and remained constant. Greater acid suppression appeared to result in greater improvement in terms of HRQoL.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free