Evidence Hub

Does Post Sleeve Gastrectomy Proton Pump Inhibitors Prescription Affect Complications, Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease, and Mucosal Lesions? A Randomized Prospective Study

A. Iossa, A. Micalizzi, G. Cavallaro, M. Giuffrè, F. Palma, Francesco de Angelis, G. Silecchia

Bariatric Surgical Practice and Patient Care, 2024

11 participants

Abstract

Purpose: This randomized control trial (trial.gov registration number NCT04400136, May 22, 2020) was designed to reach two major endpoints. The primary goal is establishing the need for a proton pump inhibitors (PPI) prescription to prevent early complications (30 days). The secondary endpoint is to evaluate the incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) using a validated questionnaire—Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Questionnaire—and the effect of different protocols on mucosal lesions detected at upper gastrointestinal endoscopy at 1 year. Methods: One hundred and twenty patients undergoing primary sleeve gastrectomy but asymptomatic for GERD were automatically randomized (11:1) into Group A: No PPI; Group B: Lansoprazole 30 mg once a day for 6 months; and Group C: Lansoprazole 30 mg once a day for 3 months. Patients with clinical/endoscopic esophageal disease, with history of chronic use of PPI or candidate to revisional procedures, were excluded. Results: No readmissions or surgery-related complications were reported perioperatively. At a mean follow-up of 12 months, the following observations were noted Group A (no PPI): 11 patients (27.5%) reported having GERD symptoms. Group B (long-term): 3 patients (7.5%) reintroduced PPI (one de novo hiatal hernia). Group C (short-term): 1 patient (2.5%) reported GERD symptoms. Endoscopic lesions appear in 11 patients (9.2%) independently from symptoms and PPI protocol. Conclusions: PPI are useless as a…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 11 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free