Evidence Hub

Characteristic pathological findings of achalasia behind unresectable esophageal cancer with pathological complete response after chemotherapy: a case report and literature review

Okamoto K, Miyata T, Asakawa T, Furuse K, Maruyama K, Motoyama S, Nagayama T, Nishiki H et al.

BMC gastroenterology, 2026

Abstract

Background: Esophageal achalasia is a rare disease characterized by impaired peristalsis throughout the esophagus, marked esophageal dilation, and nonorganic stenosis of the lower esophagus due to degeneration of the Auerbach's plexus, and it is a known risk factor for esophageal cancer. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported case of achalasia‑associated advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma successfully treated using a multidisciplinary approach.

Case presentation: A 69-year-old female presented to our department with a 10-yr history of dysphagia and vomiting, accompanied by worsening hematemesis and passage disturbance. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy revealed a protruding lesion with stricture in the mid-to-lower thoracic esophagus, and biopsy confirmed squamous cell carcinoma. Further evaluation revealed unresectable advanced esophageal cancer with multiple lymph node metastases involving the dorsal descending aorta and left supraclavicular region. Following induction chemotherapy, marked shrinkage and disappearance of the primary tumor and metastatic lymph node were observed. However, nonorganic narrowing of the esophagogastric junction, along with esophageal tortuosity and dilation, persisted, leading to a diagnosis of esophageal achalasia. The patient subsequently underwent conversion thoracoscopic esophagectomy with the intent of achieving radical resection. Histopathological examination of the resected specimen demonstrated pathological complete…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free