Evidence Hub

Bioequivalence study of vonoprazan fumarate tablets in healthy Chinese subjects: a randomized, open-label, two-period crossover trial

Jin Yu, Sisi Lin, Yongjie Luo, Yamin Deng, Haifeng Yin, Hong Sun, Jingzhi Yu, Y Zhang

Frontiers in Pharmacology, 2026

72 participants

Abstract

Objectives To evaluate the bioequivalence and safety of a test formulation (Vonoprazan Fumarate Tablets, 20 mg, T) compared with the reference product (Takecab®, 20 mg, R) in healthy Chinese subjects under both fasting and fed conditions. Methods This was a single-center, randomized, open-label, single-dose, two-sequence, two-period, crossover study. Seventy-two healthy subjects were enrolled and assigned to either a fasting (n = 32) or a fed (n = 40) cohort. In each period, subjects received a single dose of either the test (T) or reference (R) formulation, separated by a 5-day washout period before crossing over to the alternate treatment. Plasma vonoprazan concentrations were quantified using a validated high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) method. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using non-compartmental analysis. Bioequivalence was assessed by determining whether the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the geometric mean ratios (GMRs, T/R) of C max , AUC 0-t , and AUC 0 ‐ ∞ fell within the predefined range of 80%–125%. Results Seventy of the 72 enrolled subjects completed the study. Under fasting conditions, the GMRs (90% CIs) for C max , AUC 0-t , and AUC 0 ‐ ∞ were 95.45% (88.96%–102.41%), 98.15% (93.93%–102.56%), and 98.53% (94.41%–102.83%), respectively. Under fed conditions, the corresponding values were 105.00% (94.35%–116.85%) for C max , 101.96% (98.10%–105.97%) for AUC 0-t , and 102.31% (98.58%–106.17%) for AUC 0…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 72 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free