Evidence Hub

Time Course for Benefit and Risk of Clopidogrel and Aspirin after Acute Transient Ischemic Attack and Minor Ischemic Stroke: A Secondary Analysis from the POINT Randomized Trial

S. C. Johnston, Jordan Elm, J. D. Easton, M. Farrant, William G. Barsan, Anthony S. Kim, Anne S. Lindblad, Yuko Y. Palesch et al.

Circulation, 2019

4,881 participants · 65 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In patients with acute minor ischemic stroke or high-risk transient ischemic attack enrolled in the POINT trial, the combination of clopidogrel and aspirin for 90 days reduced major ischemic events but increased major hemorrhage compared to aspirin alone.

METHODS

In a secondary analysis of POINT (N=4,881), we assessed the time course for benefit and risk from the combination of clopidogrel and aspirin. The primary efficacy outcome was a composite of ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, or ischemic vascular death. The primary safety outcome was major hemorrhage. Risks and benefits were estimated for delayed times of treatment initiation using left-truncated models.

RESULTS

Through 90 days, the rate of major ischemic events was initially high then decreased markedly, while the rate of major hemorrhage remained low but relatively constant throughout. Using a model-based approach, the optimal change-point for major ischemic events was 21 days (0-21 days HR 0.65 for clopidogrel-aspirin vs. aspirin, 95% CI 0.50-0.85, p=0.0015, compared to 22-90 days HR 1.38, 95% CI 0.81-2.35, p=0.24). Models showed benefits of clopidogrel-aspirin for treatment delayed as long as 3 days after symptom onset.

CONCLUSIONS

The benefit of clopidogrel-aspirin occurs predominantly within the first 21 days, and outweighs the low, but ongoing risk of major hemorrhage. When considered with the results of CHANCE, a similar trial treating with clopidogrel-aspirin for 21 days and showing no…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 4,881 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free