Evidence Hub

Biomechanically Valid Clear Aligner Therapy for Premolar Extraction Case: A Case Report and Literature Review

Yimeng Xu, B. Kou, Xiayu Zhang, Yi-Rong Hu, Yue Hui, Siyu Lan, Zexu Gu

Case Reports in Dentistry, 2025

1 citation

Abstract

This case report details the successful orthodontic management of an adult female with skeletal Class II malocclusion, protrusive facial profile with perioral muscle tension, and mild crowding using clear aligners following extraction of four first premolars. To address the inherent challenges of “roller‐coaster effects,” a biomechanically appropriate protocol was implemented including rational case analysis and selection, as well as attachment design, anchorage control, overcorrection strategy, and tooth movement pattern. The treatment process successfully avoided refinements and the “roller‐coaster effects,” accomplishing the entire therapeutic plan with the initial series of clear aligners. This study demonstrates the individualized biomechanical protocols to bridge discrepancies between virtual treatment predictions and real‐world therapeutic efficacy, particularly in premolar extraction cases where uncontrolled tipping threatens predictability.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free