Evidence Hub

Effectiveness, Usability, and Acceptability of ChatGPT With Retrieval-Augmented Generation (SIV-ChatGPT) in Increasing Seasonal Influenza Vaccination Uptake Among Older Adults: Quasi-Experimental Study

Wang Z, Tsang TH, Yu FY, Fang Y, Chen S, Sun F, Mo PKH, Wong KC

Journal of medical Internet research, 2025

45 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Older adults are more vulnerable to severe consequences caused by seasonal influenza. Although seasonal influenza vaccination (SIV) is effective and free vaccines are available, the SIV uptake rate remained inadequate among people aged 65 years or older in Hong Kong, China. There was a lack of studies evaluating ChatGPT in promoting vaccination uptake among older adults.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of ChatGPT with retrieval-augmented generation in increasing SIV uptake among older adults over a 3-month study period in Hong Kong, China. Participants in an ongoing observational cohort study conducted in the same period served as the comparison group.

METHODS: A quasi-experimental study was conducted between November 2024 and April 2025. Participants were (1) aged ≥65 years, (2) possessed a Hong Kong ID, (3) able to speak and comprehend Cantonese, (4) smartphone users, and (5) had no SIV uptake for the approaching flu season. Those with a diagnosis of cognitive impairment or dementia, blindness or deafness, or known contraindications to the SIV were excluded. Participants were recruited through random telephone calls. There were 45 and 55 participants in the SIV-ChatGPT group and the comparison group, respectively. All participants completed follow-up surveys at T1 (1 month after the baseline survey, for the SIV-ChatGPT group only) and T2 (3 months after the baseline survey, for both groups). Participants in the SIV-ChatGPT group gained…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 45 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free