Evidence Hub

Development of retrieval-augmented generation-based large language model for drug-induced liver injury using Livertox data

Rao A, Cholankeril G, Flores A, Sood G, White TE, Kanwal F, El-Serag HB

Hepatology communications, 2026

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Idiosyncratic DILI is a complex clinical challenge requiring timely and accurate decision support. LiverTox, curated by the National Institute of Health (NIH), offers a comprehensive DILI evidence base, but its encyclopedia-like format hinders point-of-care use. Health care providers increasingly use general large language models (LLMs) for clinical care, raising safety concerns due to LLM hallucinations or misinformation. We hypothesize that retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) integration-grounding LLM responses in LiverTox content-would enable accurate DILI decision support.

METHODS: We processed 1343 LiverTox drug monographs into 8759 indexed segments using BioBERT embeddings. We developed a RAG pipeline that employs drug-specific prioritization, section-aware weighting, and semantic search to retrieve the most relevant content per query. Twenty-five DILI questions were evaluated across 6 models: 4 RAG-LLMs: Mistral-7B, Claude-3-Haiku, Claude-3-Opus, and GPT-4o, and 2 non-RAG GPT-4o variants (unconstrained; soft constrained with a prompt to reference LiverTox). Three hepatologists, blinded to the model, evaluated responses for accuracy, completeness, and conciseness using 5-point Likert scales. Analyses included pairwise comparisons and effect size estimation.

RESULTS: One hundred fifty model responses were evaluated with good inter-rater reliability. GPT-4o (RAG) achieved the highest overall scores (4.47±0.10). RAG-LLMs outperformed non-RAG GPT-4o variants…

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free