Evidence Hub

Deterministic Fact Validation for Retrieval-Augmented Generation of Clinical Data Reviewer's Guides: A Proposed Architecture

Puli SK

2026

Abstract

Abstract Objective: Data Reviewer's Guides (DRGs) accompanying CDISC-compliant clinical trial datasets are increasingly drafted using retrieval-augmented generation (RAG). The most detailed published account of this practice reports human review as the only safeguard between a generated draft and a submitted document, with no automated step checking generated claims against the study's own structured metadata before a reviewer opens the file. This paper proposes an architecture to close that gap.

Methods:: We propose a deterministic, non-large-language-model validation layer inserted between draft generation and human review, organized around a fact contract that converts each checkable clinical assertion, such as a subject count or treatment-arm allocation, into a claim-source-method-result tuple resolved by direct lookup against source metadata rather than by a second model's judgment. Because no such system has yet been implemented or deployed, we conducted a disclosed, parameterized simulation of 2,000 documents per condition comparing four pipeline configurations: a baseline LLM, retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), RAG with LLM-based self-verification, and RAG with the proposed deterministic validator, across eleven metrics spanning factual accuracy, validation coverage, reviewer workload, and latency.

Results:: Self-verification achieved near-complete validation coverage (1.000) but recovered only 48.0 percent of true errors among the claims it checked, with an 8.1…

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free