Evidence Hub

Improving Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A Systematic Literature Review of Retrieval-Enhancement Techniques

Karasan A

2026

Abstract

Abstract Large language models are highly fluent and effective across a wide range of tasks but remain vulnerable to hallucination, knowledge staleness, and limited provenance of generated outputs. Retrieval-augmented generation addresses these limitations by grounding generation in externally retrieved evidence and has become a rapidly growing research area. However, advances are dispersed across pipeline stages, evaluated using heterogeneous metrics, and spread across multiple research communities, leaving the field without a comprehensive synthesis. This paper presents a systematic literature review of 173 studies on RAG retrieval enhancement published between 2024 and 2026, identified through searches across six major bibliographic databases. Studies are categorised by (i) their primary technical contribution, (ii) application domain, and (iii) the RAG pipeline stage they target, including pre-retrieval, retrieval, post-retrieval, generation-integrated approaches, and cross-stage modular or agentic architectures. Representative and highly cited methods are analysed in detail while ensuring coverage of all included studies. The review identifies four key findings: Uneven research effort across pipeline stages, fragmented evaluation practices, limited reporting of computational cost, and a strong focus on healthcare applications. Based on these findings, it proposes a structured research agenda to advance RAG systems toward more comparable, efficient, and generalisable…

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free