Evidence Hub

Fine-Tuning, Retrieval-Augmented Generation, and Hybrid Large Language Models for Postoperative Decision Support: Comparative Analysis

Prabha S, Collaco BG, Gomez-Cabello CA, Haider SA, Genovese A, Fang Z, Wood N, Bagaria S et al.

Journal of medical Internet research, 2026

Abstract

Background: Large language models (LLMs) show growing potential for decision support. However, integrating domain-specific medical knowledge while maintaining accuracy, safety, and interpretability remains challenging for postoperative discharge instructions and patient education. Fine-tuning, retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), and hybrid fine-tuning+RAG approaches are prominent strategies for knowledge integration, but their comparative performance in postoperative care has not been systematically evaluated.

Objective: We aimed to compare the performance, reliability, and safety characteristics of baseline, fine-tuning, RAG, and hybrid fine-tuning+RAG LLM configurations for postoperative decision support.

Methods: We conducted a comparative evaluation of 4 LLM configurations using Google Gemini 2.5 Flash. A total of 600 postoperative question and answer pairs were used for model adaptation and validation, while 150 queries were reserved for final evaluation. Queries included routine postoperative questions, emergency escalation scenarios, and deliberately out-of-scope prompts. Outputs were independently assessed by 3 blinded clinical experts for clinical medical accuracy, safety or refusal accuracy, completeness, and relevance. Automated metrics evaluated readability, faithfulness, and hallucination propensity.

Results: All knowledge-enhanced models significantly outperformed baseline in overall accuracy (baseline 68% vs fine-tuning 92.7%, RAG 91.3%, fine-tuning+RAG…

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free