Evidence Hub

Retrieval-Augmented Generation vs. Baseline LLMs: A Multi-Metric Evaluation for Knowledge-Intensive Content

Aparna Vinayan Kozhipuram, Samar Shailendra, Rajan Kadel

Inf., 2025

16 citations

Abstract

(1) Background: The development of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) is transforming knowledge-intensive domains such as Education. However, Large Language Models (LLMs), which serve as the foundational components for GenAI tools, are trained on static datasets, often producing misleading, factually incorrect, or outdated responses. Our study explores the performance gains of Retrieval-Augmented LLMs over baseline LLMs while also identifying the trade-off opportunity between smaller-parameter LLMs augmented with user-specific data to larger parameter LLMs. (2) Methods: We experimented with four different LLMs, each with a different number of parameters, to generate outputs. These outputs were then evaluated across seven lexical and semantic metrics to identify performance trends in Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)-Augmented LLMs and analyze the impact of parameter size on LLM performance. (3) Results and Discussions: We have synthesized 968 different combinations to identify this trend with the help of different LLM sizes/parameters: TinyLlama 1.1B, Mistral 7B, Llama 3.1 8B, and Llama 1 13 B. These studies were grouped into two themes: RAG-Augmented LLM percentage improvements to baseline LLMs and compelling trade-off possibilities of RAG-Augmented smaller-parameter LLMs to larger-parameter LLMs. Our experiments show that RAG-Augmented LLMs demonstrate high lexical and semantic scores relative to baseline LLMs. This offers RAG-Augmented LLMs as a compelling…

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free