Evidence Hub

Effects of Preimplantation Genetic Screening for Aneuploidies in Infertile Female Patients With Recurrent Spontaneous Abortion History

ClinicalTrials.gov · COMPLETED, 2017

189 participants

Abstract

Recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) is a multifactorial disorder which affects about 1% of all couples and challenges both patients and clinicians technically and emotionally. IVF clinics see higher prevalence of RPL, since many RPL patients are seeking for assist reproduction treatment with or without other infertile factors. Guidelines for evaluation and treatment of RPL patients include screening for uterine abnormalities, parental chromosomes, autoimmune antibodies and cure gynecological infections, but there are still half of RPL patients remain unexplained.

The documented high incidence of chromosomal errors in first-trimester miscarriages and an increased rate of aneuploidy in patients with RPL has led to the theory that screening embryos before implantation for aneuploidy may decrease the risk of a subsequent loss and serve as a possible treatment. The technology, indications of use, and even terminology for genetic testing of embryos have greatly changed since the first PGD(pre-implantation genetic diagnosis) baby was born in 1990. The current best evidence shows blastocyst biopsy followed by new rapid comprehensive chromosome screening(termed pre-implantation chromosomal screening or comprehensive chromosome screening, PCS or CCS, or the investigators generally termed PGS) based on array-comprehensive genome hybridization(aCGH), single nucleotide polymorphism array(SNP-array) or next generation sequencing(NGS), to be the most powerful technology. However, for whom this…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 189 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free