Evidence Hub

Generative artificial intelligence and large language models in sports medicine: a scoping review of applications, accuracy, and ethical implications

Dergaa I, Dergaa MA, Razzak M, Ceylan Hİ, Stefanica V, Muntean RI, Guelmami N

Frontiers in public health, 2026

6 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI), particularly large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT, GPT-3.5, and GPT-4, is rapidly being integrated into sports medicine practice. These tools are increasingly used by health professionals, coaches, and athletes for training prescription, rehabilitation, nutrition, mental health support, injury prevention, and academic writing. However, their adoption has outpaced the development of robust evidence regarding their clinical utility, accuracy, and safety, and no comprehensive synthesis of this emerging field currently exists.

AIM: This scoping review aimed to map the current evidence on GenAI and LLM applications in sports medicine and athlete health, evaluate their accuracy and hallucination risks across domains, and synthesise reported ethical and governance concerns.

METHODS: The review followed PRISMA-ScR guidelines and Joanna Briggs Institute methodology. Six databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, SPORTDiscus, IEEE Xplore, and CINAHL) were searched for studies published between January 2022 and March 2026. Eligibility criteria were defined using the Population-Concept-Context framework. Two independent reviewers conducted screening, full-text assessment, and data extraction, with strong inter-rater agreement (κ = 0.82).

RESULTS: Of 1,847 records identified, 32 studies were included. Applications were classified into seven domains: training and exercise prescription (n = 5), nutrition (n = 4),…

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free