Evidence Hub

Artificial intelligence in clinical trials-state of the evidence, gaps, and next steps

Armoundas AA, Tarabanis C, Loscalzo J

EClinicalMedicine, 2026

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Artificial intelligence (AI) affects clinical trials in two distinct but overlapping ways: as the intervention under evaluation and as infrastructure supporting trial design, recruitment, monitoring, endpoint assessment, analysis, and reporting. In this manuscript, we define AI-as-intervention as AI whose output is itself part of the assigned clinical intervention being evaluated for its effect on participant care or outcomes, and AI-for-trial-operations as AI used to support trial design, conduct, or analysis without itself constituting the treatment under study. This is an important distinction because AI-as-intervention generally requires prospective clinical evaluation with prespecified estimands, prospectively governed model behaviour, and protocol-level oversight, whereas AI-for-trial-operations is often judged by workflow accuracy, impact of the decision, transportability, and safety under real-world constraints, although some uses, such as endpoint support or inferential modelling, may also require similarly explicit change control and oversight. Using this distinction as an analytical framework rather than as a division into separate parts, we examine how AI can improve each phase of the clinical-trial lifecycle, what evidence currently supports these applications, what limitations constrain their validity and transportability, and what methodological and governance safeguards are required. We synthesise evidence across safety, efficacy, operational risk…

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free