Evidence Hub

Cross-modal bias in medical vision-language models: a pipeline-aware framework for mechanisms, evaluation, and mitigation

Mehda R, Oishi RA, Alam TT, Morol MK, Hui LT

Frontiers in digital health, 2026

Abstract

Medical vision-language models encode images and clinical text in a shared representation. Across radiology and ophthalmology, their diagnostic performance now approaches that of specialist clinicians. The mechanism behind that performance is also the source of a problem that has gone largely unexamined. These models are trained by contrastive alignment, so bias from the image encoder and bias from the text encoder meet at a single point: the alignment interface. There they can interact and compound in ways that single-modality systems never experience. Fairness research has so far studied the two modalities separately, and medical vision-language models have fallen into the gap between those literatures. We organize the evidence into a three-tier taxonomy keyed to the pretraining pipeline. Tier 1 is data-level bias in the pretraining corpus. Tier 2 is alignment bias produced at the contrastive interface. Tier 3 is inference-time bias that surfaces during deployment. Within this structure, we compare the major evaluation benchmarks, show where they disagree, and assign each mitigation strategy to the tier it actually addresses. Three points emerge. First, no published method spans all three tiers; mitigation is fragmented by pipeline stage. Second, fine-tuning does not remove alignment-stage bias, even in parameter-efficient form, which shifts the burden of debiasing onto pretraining rather than adaptation. Third, the inference-time failures are more dangerous than the…

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free