Evidence Hub

Domain-Specific vs. General Purpose Large Language Models in Agriculture: A Narrative Review of Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) for Evidence-Based Extension Services

Ralph Laurence L. Vigo, Chris Adrian H. Uy, Esparcia Jay Ar

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), 2026

Abstract

The rapid development of Large Language Models (LLMs) has enabled the use of chat-based systems to support agricultural knowledge sharing, particularly for rural communities. However, general-purpose models often lack domain grounding, which can lead to inaccurate outputs and a localization gap where recommendations do not match local conditions and available resources. This study presents a narrative review guided by PRISMA methodology, analyzing literature published between 2018 and 2026 from platforms such as Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, IEEE Xplore, and MDPI. The review focuses on how LLMs are applied in agricultural extension services and examines their limitations in real-world use. The study compares general-purpose models with domain-specific systems such as AgriGPT, AgroLLM, and AgriBERT. The findings indicate that domain-specific models perform better in terms of accuracy and relevance when trained on curated agricultural data, while general-purpose models are limited by lack of contextual grounding. Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is identified as an effective approach for improving reliability by linking outputs to verifiable sources. In addition, multimodal systems enhance performance in tasks such as crop disease detection. The reviewed literature suggests that integrating RAG-based systems may improve traceability, grounding and reliability in agriculture, particularly where evidence based extension support is critical.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free