Evidence Hub

GEAR-Up: Generative AI and External Knowledge-Based Retrieval: Upgrading Scholarly Article Searches for Systematic Reviews

Kaushik Roy, Vedant Khandelwal, Valerie Lookingbill, Harshul Surana, Heather Heckman, Amit Sheth

Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2024

9 citations

Abstract

This paper addresses the time-intensive nature of systematic reviews (SRs) and proposes a solution leveraging advancements in Generative AI (e.g., ChatGPT) and external knowledge augmentation (e.g., Retrieval-Augmented Generation). The proposed system, GEAR-Up, automates query development and translation in SRs, enhancing efficiency by enriching user queries with context from language models and knowledge graphs. Collaborating with librarians, qualitative evaluations demonstrate improved reproducibility and search strategy quality. Access the demo at https://youtu.be/zMdP56GJ9mU.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free