Evidence Hub

Systematic review of multimodal approaches and evaluation metrics in Chinese medical image captioning

Xiongmin Xuan, Juhaida Abu Bakar, Hapini Awang

Multidisciplinary Reviews, 2026

Abstract

This review examines Chinese medical image captioning (MIC), with emphasis on multimodal modeling and evaluation metrics for chest X-ray (CXR) report generation. Following the PRISMA 2020 guideline, this review searched IEEE Xplore, ACM Digital Library, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, PubMed, and arXiv for studies published between 2015 and 2025; 60 of 120 assessed full-text records were included. The study was organized around three themes: linguistic and data foundations, multimodal modeling trajectories, and evaluation methods for clinically meaningful assessment. The reviewed literature shows a movement from CNN-RNN encoder-decoder models toward Transformer-based architectures, cross-modal attention, retrieval-augmented generation, knowledge-guided modeling, and vision-language pre-training. In Chinese MIC, however, this modeling shift is constrained by limited public image-report resources, heterogeneous dataset access, and the language-specific effects of segmentation, compact terminology, negation, uncertainty, and clinical modifiers. General Chinese captioning and cross-lingual resources provide useful starting points, but they do not directly resolve the requirements of Chinese clinical reporting. Evaluation remains a distinct limitation in the reviewed literature. Common metrics such as BLEU, ROUGE, METEOR, CIDEr, and SPICE support comparison across studies, but they mainly reflect surface overlap and may fail to capture clinically meaningful errors. Recent work has…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free