Evidence Hub

Effectiveness of telerehabilitation in non-operatively managed shoulder conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Lin TW, Yang Y, Hong HY, Zhou XB, Tung TH, Zheng BB, Zhang JM

BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2025

5 citations

Abstract

Background: Non-operatively managed shoulder conditions, including rotator cuff tendinopathy, subacromial pain syndrome, adhesive capsulitis, and non-displaced proximal humerus fractures, frequently cause pain and restricted mobility. While traditional rehabilitation is effective, access to in-person therapy can be hindered by various factors. Telerehabilitation, which leverages telecommunication technologies, is a promising alternative to traditional in-person rehabilitation. However, its overall efficacy remains uncertain due to inconsistent findings in prior studies.

Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the effectiveness of telerehabilitation for non-operatively managed shoulder conditions, concentrating on randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The control group received standard in-person rehabilitation or home-based exercise programs. The primary outcomes assessed were pain (using the visual Analog Scale [VAS]), range of motion (ROM) including flexion, abduction, external rotation and internal rotation, as well as functional outcomes evaluated through the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index [SPADI], Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand [DASH], and Quick DASH scores.

Results: Eight randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. Data synthesis employed random-effects or fixed-effects models based on heterogeneity, with the risk of bias evaluated via the Cochrane Collaboration tool. Telerehabilitation over 12 weeks significantly reduced pain…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free