Evidence Hub

A Bayesian meta-analysis on MRI-based radiomics for predicting EGFR mutation in brain metastasis of lung cancer

Tabnak P, Kargar Z, Ebrahimnezhad M, HajiEsmailPoor Z

BMC medical imaging, 2025

6 citations

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic test accuracy of MRI-based radiomics studies for predicting EGFR mutation in brain metastasis originating from lung cancer.

Methods: This meta-analysis, conducted following PRISMA guidelines, involved a systematic search in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science up to November 3, 2024. Eligibility criteria followed the PICO framework, assessing population, intervention, comparison, and outcome. The RQS and QUADAS-2 tools were employed for quality assessment. A Bayesian model determined summary estimates, and statistical analysis was conducted using R and STATA software.

Results: Eleven studies consisting of nine training and ten validation cohorts were included in the meta-analysis. In the training cohorts, MRI-based radiomics showed robust predictive performance for EGFR mutations in brain metastases, with an AUC of 0.90 (95% CI: 0.82-0.93), sensitivity of 0.84 (95% CI: 0.80-0.88), specificity of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.80-0.91), and a diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of 34.17 (95% CI: 19.16-57.49). Validation cohorts confirmed strong performance, with an AUC of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.69-0.95), sensitivity of 0.79 (95% CI: 0.73-0.84), specificity of 0.88 (95% CI: 0.83-0.93), and a DOR of 31.33 (95% CI: 15.50-58.3). Subgroup analyses revealed notable trends: the T1C + T2WI sequences and 3.0 T scanners showed potential superiority, machine learning-based radiomics and manual segmentation exhibited higher diagnostic accuracy, and PyRadiomics…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free