Evidence Hub

Comparative Effectiveness of Implementation Strategies for Blood Pressure Control in Hypertensive Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

K. Mills, K. Obst, Wei Shen, Sandra Molina, Huijie Zhang, Hua He, L. Cooper, Jiang He

Annals of Internal Medicine, 2017

230 citations

Abstract

Hypertension is a major public health challenge because of its high prevalence and associated cardiovascular disease and premature death (1, 2). Randomized clinical trials have shown that pharmaceutical treatment and lifestyle modifications reduce blood pressure (BP) and risk for cardiovascular disease (3, 4). Despite the proven effectiveness of these interventions, only 13.8% of adults with hypertension and 37.1% of patients with treated hypertension worldwide had their BP controlled in 2010 (1). Barriers to hypertension control have been identified at the health care system, health care provider, and patient levels (5). Such barriers include limited health care resources, lack of performance standards, and limited reimbursement for health coaching at the system level; lack of adherence to clinical guidelines at the provider level; and lack of adherence to prescribed medications and lifestyle modifications at the patient level (5). Implementation strategies to overcome the barriers to BP control, such as home BP monitoring, health coaching, provider training, and team-based care, have been tested in randomized trials (6, 7). Most trials, however, have relatively small sample sizes and limited statistical power to reliably estimate intervention effects. Two previous reviews of implementation strategies for BP reduction included studies published up to 2003 and 2008 (6, 7). They showed that, compared with usual care, many implementation strategies, including team change and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free