Evidence Hub

Bibliometric analysis of gamification in teacher education during the generative AI era: historical trends, present status, and future trajectories

Rincón Pinzón MA, Vargas Sánchez AD, Glasserman Morales LD

F1000Research, 2026

Abstract

Gamification has become a relevant pedagogical approach in teacher education, yet its evolution and relationship with generative artificial intelligence remain fragmented. This study maps the development, intellectual structure, and emerging trajectories of research on gamification in pre-service and in-service teacher education between 2016 and 2025. A bibliometric analysis was conducted on an integrated Scopus and Web of Science dataset. After merging records, removing duplicates, and applying predefined eligibility criteria, 1,223 documents were retained. Performance analysis, co-citation analysis, keyword co-occurrence analysis, and thematic evolution mapping were conducted in Biblioshiny/Bibliometrix, with study identification and selection documented through the PRISMA framework. Scientific output increased markedly over the study period, especially from 2020 onward, and was led mainly by institutions and countries with strong educational innovation capacity. The co-citation network revealed three intellectual foundations: motivational theories of gamification, technology adoption and educational innovation models, and empirical work on game-based learning and serious games. Keyword co-occurrence analysis identified seven thematic clusters organized around gamification, education, artificial intelligence, teacher training, and digital learning. By 2025, the field shows a clear thematic shift toward generative artificial intelligence, adaptive systems, and automated…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free